It is not always possible to foresee and prevent all failures. However, the principle of so-called preventive maintenance helps to significantly reduce the probability of failures. In the best case, a failure of the plant can be prevented by replacing or repairing an impaired component in advance. Such “planned maintenance” can usefully be carried out at a time when it will cause the least disruption to the production process.
This is done using data from previous maintenance, which can be used to better estimate the service life of individual components. Computer-aided software makes it easy to keep track of all equipment and maintenance schedules and to coordinate measures. For example, colleagues can use the software to communicate with each other about the individual steps, components and procedures. In addition, a component that will be needed in the near future can already be purchased so that it is immediately available when needed. If a failure does occur, it can be easily recorded via the software and the information is always clearly and quickly available for the future.
Within preventive maintenance, differences are again made in the type and frequency of maintenance. If maintenance is simply carried out at regular intervals, we speak of routine or “time-based” maintenance. In this way, faults in the system can be found at an early stage. In the same way, this approach means that components are replaced that are still intact or whose failure would not endanger the system.
Among the different variants, the so-called “condition-based” maintenance is therefore the most economical. As the name suggests, this involves regular checks to determine whether the condition and performance of the plant acutely requires action. Only if a component is really in danger of failing is it replaced or repaired – so there is less waste from replacing parts that are still working. However, this constant monitoring by maintenance teams also costs many man-hours and is relatively complicated. This should be taken into account when choosing maintenance planning.
Comments
No comments